Understanding why and how almost 50% of the country thinks that the government is in such dire need of change that they have continued to vote out incumbents at the cost of electing equally unqualified candidates is telling. I think that the percentage of militant voters would rise exponentially if those re-elected could not continue to fund the exorbitant amount of government pork. Free money is never free.
These government programs never have performance goals or sunset clauses. How does the EOCC measure success?
Excellent!
Agree wholeheartedly with your premise here.
Understanding why and how almost 50% of the country thinks that the government is in such dire need of change that they have continued to vote out incumbents at the cost of electing equally unqualified candidates is telling. I think that the percentage of militant voters would rise exponentially if those re-elected could not continue to fund the exorbitant amount of government pork. Free money is never free.
These government programs never have performance goals or sunset clauses. How does the EOCC measure success?